My idea for the artificial reef to mitigate storm wave erosion was to use "waste rip rap" that which did not meet highway construction standards since the rock was just to provide for the hold fasts for kelp. My thinking was, by mining the rock on the south side of the bay, for Spit rip rap, a harbor for small boats visiting the park lands could simultaneously be built, enhancing the public's access to the public's lands. Regional tourism could be enhanced. The locals could have a nice "day use area" on the south side of the bay, the Spit could be fixed up, a reef to enhance fisheries and mitigate storm wave erosion could be built ... and none of it would be ecologically detrimental.
But noooo! We have to have public parklands as someone's private back yard. We have to think about private profit at public expense and increased costs for public projects with no thought to the future. So now what did you get?
You didn't get an artificial reef for storm wave mitigation. You didn't get a day use harbor on the south side of the bay. You don't have affordable rock for a local project anywhere close because of transportation costs, and you have the high cost of a jillion other ecological concerns to get rock, even if you can afford to buy rocks.
You did get the Corps of Engineers to "rethink" fiscal feasibility elsewhere.
Steve Herbert
Des Moines, Iowa






