Point of View: Follow Hammond’s advice by adjusting oil taxes to redeem state’s share

Larry Smith

Larry Smith

There are at least eight state savings and investment funds operating today, quasi-independent of legislative appropriations. The Department of Revenue manages the Alaska Retirement Management Fund (ARM) which controls an estimated $30 billion. The Treasury Division manages an estimated $22 billion of non-pension assets. Various quasi-independent state entities (Alaska Industrial and Export Authority, Alaska Housing Finance Corporation and the Alaska Railroad Fund) hold about $3.5 billion more. This includes the Mental Health Trust which is required to let the Alasks Permanent Fund Corporation invest its money — a good thing since the Alaska Permanent Fund has grown while the pension fund has been underwater partly from mistakes in Department of Revenue investment strategy. The total of our financial assets may exceed $125 billion at present.

The recently established Percent of Market Value (POMV) formula lacks the controls advocated by Gov. Jay Hammond which are similar to those of the $1 trillion Norway Sovereign Wealth Fund.

As Gov. Jay Hammond said, “Only when the the market value of the Permanent Fund has increased over the previous year … may a portion of such increase be distributed.”

Norway has a maximum 4% POMV and has no draw when the previous year shows no increase. Our POMV could have such sideboards added. The POMV could follow the lead of funds with max dollar percentage; in fact the Mental Health Trust has that limit, a full 22% less than the 5.25% max we are using. Using without the Hammond suggested limits, the Permanent Fund Trustee Paper #9 recently published calls our Permanent Fund “underwater” because the take is too high when added to inflation.

Spending should not include credits for oil production from legacy fields. Incentives, bonuses and AIDEA support for Cook Inlet and other fields should be reconsidered. An income tax is reasonable. After all, from 1948 we paid the tax and achieving statehood was based, in large part, on that willingness to pay our way, however partially. Statehood was sponsored by Territorial Gov. Ernesst Gruening, who, in 1941, also proposed a permanent fund so that in future there would be no industry that carried away our wealth, leaving a trail of ghost towns. He was talking about copper, of course.

To bridge the gap between the time when the state’s share of production revenue increases and the present session, I believe that the reduced services of AIDEA and AHFC should become functions of a Department of Commerce and Economic Development, and the related billions be transferred to the Permanent Fund. A bigger, well-managed fund is a safer place for our money. Careful consideration should be given to the conclusions of the financial assets report to the governor. Legislative Finance Director Pat Pitney was a ranking participant in this group which forwarded the idea of advantages of centralizing our multiple funds.

Reducing dividends to individuals may, regretfully, be needed in the short term, while we seek the Alaska agreed-on share of oil revenues. Hammond said the deal was one-third for industry, one-third for the nation and one-third for the state of gross oil revenues. Every year since the industry has lobbied hard and gained a greater share.

In “Diapering the Devil” (chapter 14, A Broken Bargain, pages 51-53), Hammond wrote, “First oil taxes must be adjusted to redeem the state’s share.”

I see the industry power as too great to retrieve our full third, retroactively, going back to when they got Economic Limit Factor passed, amended in their favor and lately added Senate Bill 21 to their shareholder’s advantage. The most Alaskans can hope for is removing credits and undoing the tax-breaks provided by the success of intensive lobbying.

I hope we can begin a mutually respectful relation with industry, based on our insistence on our sovereignty and willingness to do honest business. We welcomed the industry with open arms and allowed them to take away enormous profit. Their time has come to treat us the same way.

Larry Smith is a long-time area builder who thinks we should all do our best but not take ourselves too damn seriously.

More in Opinion

Dr. Anne Zink, Alaska Chief Medical Officer. (Photo courtesy of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services)
Point of View: Why all Alaskans should join me in getting a flu shot this year

During pandemic, getting a flu shot is more important than ever

The Homer Foundation logo.
Point of View: Pay It Forward through educational opportunities

I spent much of my life working in universities and colleges. I… Continue reading

Michael O'Meara's cartoon for Oct. 15, 2020.
Letters to the Editor

Thoughts from readers like you

Michael O'Meara's cartoon for Oct. 8, 2020.
Letters to the Editor

Thoughts from readers like you

Hal Shepherd in an undated photo taken near Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Hal Shepherd.)
Point of View: Is sacrificing ANWR worth it?

There are alternatives to sacrificing the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s coastal plain

Xochitl Lopez-Ayala stands in front of the Kachemak Bay Family Planning Clinic booth at Pride 2019 on June 22, 2019, in Homer, Alaska. (Photo courtesy of Xochitl Lopez-Ayala)
Point of View: Reproductive justice is also immigrant justice

The Kachemak Bay Family Planning Clinic Board recognizes that reproductive justice is… Continue reading

Letters to the Editor

Thoughts from readers like you

Ronnie Leach. (Photo provided)
Point of View: Domestic Violence in the time of COVID

October is Domestic Violence (DV) Awareness month. This is a time for… Continue reading

Ariel Silverman (Photo courtesy of Ariel Silverman)
Point of View: Why recycling electronics helps fight Pebble

For the past 15 years, Cook Inletkeeper and its partners have hosted… Continue reading

Most Read